|
|
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| == Modules? ==
| |
|
| |
|
| Should modules be documented as part of this page, or should each module be given its own page (which can be subsequently linked to from here)?
| |
|
| |
| Additionally, is it appropriate to document modules now, with the new System Settings layout coming in KDE SC 4.4? [[User:The madman|The madman]] 19:30, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| :My feeling is that we should perhaps do a page similar to the Applications pages, one for each section, from which individual modules can be linked/documented.
| |
|
| |
| :I agree, though, that this may not be the best time to do it. When we are seeing 4.4 betas, perhaps, we may be able to get moving on it. Otherwise, we have to do them twice in a short time. Unless, of course, you think that documenting the modules will be fine and we just have to move links around as things get reorganized. If you are aware than anything more than shuffling around is likely to happen, let's wait. If it's just reorganizing it may be worth starting now. --[[User:Annew|annew]] 14:19, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| ::Yes, I think we should at least wait for the new 4.4 release. Perhaps prepare the pages, using the changes in 4.4 Beta, then only reveal them when KDE SC 4.4 is stable.
| |
|
| |
| ::I agree that perhaps there should be a page from http://userbase.kde.org called, "Settings", that looks and feels like the Applications page: control centre modules are also very numerous and comprehensive.[[User:The madman|The madman]] 09:49, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
