Jump to content

Talk:KDEConnect: Difference between revisions

From KDE Wiki Sandbox
Whoami1 (talk | contribs)
m Comments about the rendering issue
Line 14: Line 14:


I am unable to compare the current version to previous versions
I am unable to compare the current version to previous versions
:I'm not too familiar with the mediawiki system, but it seems like removing the youtube links allows it to render. Tried replacing the ev syntax with the <youtube> tag, and it still resulted in a TypeError. Seems like [https://userbase.kde.org/index.php?title=KDEConnect&oldid=476120 a December 2022 edit] is the last revision that can currently render. --[[User:Johnaoss|Johnaoss]] ([[User talk:Johnaoss|talk]]) 17:24, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:24, 6 April 2024

KDEConnect is still missing a very useful feature, luckily already implemented in GSConnect: Dial-up. When the PC user clicks on a "tel:" hyperlink, and this link type is associated with " KDEConnect", then it should, like GSConnect, transfer the phone number mentioned in the link to the smartphone dial-up application, display it and stay waiting for the push on the (green) dial-up button. I hope that, because this feature exists already in GSConnect, copying the code into KDEConnect would not be a big deal and can hence be quickly implemented. PS. I'm not sure this is the right place to discuss this. Please advice.

This is not the right place to discuss - chances that a KDEConnect developer will notice a feature request here is not great. The best way is probably to make a feature request on bugzilla. Claus chr (talk) 08:22, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Page broken

If I go to https://userbase.kde.org/KDEConnect, I get a pink box with the following error

> [fe207a0d9d835c0ef7a8e13a] 2024-04-05 21:21:15: Fatal exception of type "TypeError"

I am unable to compare the current version to previous versions

I'm not too familiar with the mediawiki system, but it seems like removing the youtube links allows it to render. Tried replacing the ev syntax with the <youtube> tag, and it still resulted in a TypeError. Seems like a December 2022 edit is the last revision that can currently render. --Johnaoss (talk) 17:24, 6 April 2024 (UTC)