Talk:Amarok: Difference between revisions
(Created page with 'The newly added section might be a bit cryptic to som users. In :'If you find that most of your music is recognised by Amarok, but some folders are not properly picked up, 'tou...') |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
(or whatever it takes to force a rescan). Is that too much detail? --[[User:Claus chr|Claus chr]] 18 September 2009 | (or whatever it takes to force a rescan). Is that too much detail? --[[User:Claus chr|Claus chr]] 18 September 2009 | ||
::fair comment. I was in a hurry to get the information down before going to a meeting, and afraid that I'd forget to do it if I left it until later. I'm not sure whether restarting Amarok is the best advice, so I've put in a compromise statement :-) Feel free to alter it if you know Amarok better than I do. --[[User:Annew|annew]] 16:18, 18 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:18, 18 September 2009
The newly added section might be a bit cryptic to som users. In
- 'If you find that most of your music is recognised by Amarok, but some folders are not properly picked up, 'touch' those folders, and the next scan will index them.',
I would suggest that the last two subparagraphs (from 'touch') are replaced by something like
- open a console and type touch folder where folder is the path to the folder, and then restart Amarok.
(or whatever it takes to force a rescan). Is that too much detail? --Claus chr 18 September 2009
- fair comment. I was in a hurry to get the information down before going to a meeting, and afraid that I'd forget to do it if I left it until later. I'm not sure whether restarting Amarok is the best advice, so I've put in a compromise statement :-) Feel free to alter it if you know Amarok better than I do. --annew 16:18, 18 September 2009 (UTC)